1. Negative voters identification
As of today, there is no facility to identify who has voted a story or a comment negatively. You could go and vote a story as lame/irrelevant and not need to identify yourself. Most users on IP are considerate and add a comment to clarify their negative vote. I suggest that when a user votes negative, an auto-comment is added to the story comments automatically. So, if I vote “Lame” for a story, it will cast one negative (Lame) vote as well as automatically add a comment “Sorry, but I think this story is lame and voted accordingly” in my name in the comments section.
2. Weighted karma
As a user repeatedly votes for stories submitted by another user, the karma boost for that user’s stories go on reducing. When User A votes for User B’s story repeatedly, with each vote, the karma boost for User B’s stories reduces. Soon, a stage is reached where User A’s votes have no effect on User B’s stories karma. This will be a great deterrent to cross-voting. See here for a detailed discussion on this approach.
3. Diversity-based karma reduction
There is a section of users who keep posting the same genre of story time and again. This can be discouraged by adding a karma dependency on the variety of sites that are used to submit stories. For example, if a user keeps submitting stories from website www.thakeli.com, the karma for her stories submitted will go on reducing. To prevent smart users from copying stories from www.thakeli.com to their blogs and then submitting them, a new kind of negative vote (say) “Repetitive” will be added to the votes – which will allow users to flag such posts easily.
4. Selective Moderators
Today, the moderators of the site are chosen based on karma. Going forward, I propose that moderators be chosen based on a group of weighted factors such as availability of the person, willingness to perform the moderation, karma, quality of past judgement and actions, approvals from other existing mods etc. This will prevent tainted users from becoming mods based on karma alone.
5. Ability to ban users who haven’t submitted a story
This is something that will ease the load on the website as well as on the users. IndianPad has declared his intention of bringing this in, but we need it more than ever.
6. Temporary User Bans
This is like a user ban facility – only it’s temporary. This feature will be a good idea when the user has been naughty (such as voting for a ton of stories in a few seconds without bothering to read them, more than three “move to adult” votes on stories submitted in one day etc). Under this facility, a user will be deactivated for a specific period of time (say a day) and then automatically reactivated.
home






