lets see who is creating all the fuss

Spencer – this is not the video yaar..

Daniela Cicarelli, a model and ex-wife of soccer great Ronaldo, sued YouTube after a video of her apparently having sex in shallow water on a beach with her boyfriend was posted to the site.

they deleted it already

YouTube to be shutdown in Brazil due to this video of Daniela Cicarelli, a model and ex-wife of soccer great Ronaldo having sex in shallow water on a beach with her boyfriend,Renato “Tato” Malzoni

WARNING: The above comment redirects you to adult section

Please Note – the above stated video is just meant for fun..ie for intrested adult ipadders to review what created all this fuss..

@HSV bhai – how come u didnt display a 18+ or adult content tag yaar… Yahan par bacche hai… bigad jayenge

actually the video is not adult, but more like a news.. what you think.. Correct me if I m wrong. I m waiting for your reply devil bhai.

Yahan par bacche hai…bigad jayenge

You mean Adults like Sahaj_Jeo

Mere internet connection ki waat lageli hai bhai..i cannot watch da video abhi..but in any case it redirects to adult section naa thz y.

Adults liks @sahajjeo – lol..yea..baccha bigad jaye gaa

This is the best publicity Google/YouTube could wish for!

@spencer – you may wanna correct the video in the comments…

its called streisand effect

Streisand Effect is a category of Internet phenomena in which a reckless attempt to censor or remove (in particular, by the means of cease-and-desist letters) a certain piece of information (such as photograph, file or website) instead backfires, causing the information in question to be widely mirrored or distributed on file-sharing networks in a very short time. The fact that the piece of information is being sought after assigns it a previously nonexistent value in the eyes of public, which encourages everybody to get “one’s own share”. Mike Masnick claims to have “jokingly” coined the term years ago, “to describe [this] increasingly common phenomenon.”[2]

The name Streisand Effect comes from an incident in which Barbra Streisand sued photographer, Kenneth Adelman, for $10 million in an attempt to have the aerial photo of her house removed from the publicly available collection of 12.000 California coastline photographs, citing privacy concerns. Adelman was photographing beach front property as a way to document coastal erosion.[3]. The picture of Streisand’s house that previously carried almost no interest to anyone suddenly spread all over the internet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

Ha Ha…lMAO…Spencer..u fine?

he did the correct analysis in such short time :D – This is exactly what we saw with Katie Rees.. She got hell lotta popularity this way only than she got on winning the crown.

You mean Adults like Sahaj_Jeo

Adults liks @sahajjeo – lol..yea..baccha bigad jaye gaa

bacha pehle se bigad chuka hai…lolzzz…aap ke aflatooni harkaton ke vajah se! Iss bache ki fikar mat karo, the “streisand effect” is built into me…and if needed…this “bacha” may leave this place for good, kam se kam har “Adult” conversation main mera naam to nahi aayega,

Seriously Nai lene ka yaar sahaj …U r over reactive sum times..similar to sulphuric acid poured into hydrogen chloride…

H2SO4 + HCL – H2 + CL2 + SO3 (correct me if i am wrong)

Please balance the equations yourself